Free diagnostic

Your bill is correct.
Your rate is not.

Utilities are required to publish every rate they may charge you, and they publish them at a length no business will ever read. Nothing on your bill is wrong. It is correct for the wrong schedule, and no document anywhere will tell you.

Read in
One bill
Costs
Nothing
Tells you
Whether to bother

Protected by Cloudflare Turnstile. Nothing for you to click.

No account needed. We keep the document because the analysis has to be reproducible, and we will delete it if you ask.

What actually happens

A model reads the tariff. Arithmetic does the rest.

  1. 01

    We read the filed tariff

    Once per schedule, under human review, never in front of a customer. Every rule we extract carries the exact sentence it came from and the page it sat on.

  2. 02

    We reprice the bill you were sent

    Before anything is recommended, the engine has to reproduce what you were actually charged, to within half a percent. If it cannot, you get told that instead of a number.

  3. 03

    We price every other schedule

    Including the voluntary ones your utility has no obligation to mention. You see what each would have cost on your own usage.

That second step is the whole method. It turns a claim you would have to take on faith into arithmetic you can check against the paper in your hand.

The signal

One number decides whether you are worth reading for.

It is called load factor, and it is on the bill already: what you averaged against what you peaked at. Our simulations put the crossover at about 40 percent, and it holds from a 12 kW workshop to a 400 kW plant.

That is why one bill is enough to start. It costs you nothing to find out which side of the line you are on.

Average load
This gap is the money
Peak demand sets what you pay for capacity all year. Average load sets what you actually used. When those two are far apart you are renting a substation to run a bakery, and a different schedule almost always prices it better.

Why nobody has done this for you

A human auditor needs your spend to clear six figures. We do not.

$100,000

Where a human auditor stops returning calls

Below that, the cost of a person reading a 200 page tariff book stops working and they decline the lead.

5.4 million

US commercial accounts under that floor

Spending roughly $150 billion a year between them, with nobody incentivised to read for them.

2.4 to 18.6%

Cheaper on Cobb EMC Rate 14T than Rate 40

From our own sweeps, mean 12.8 percent. Jackson EMC GSAE-22 runs 3.9 to 8.1 percent under GS-22. Both are voluntary schedules a customer would never find.

That floor was never a statement about where the money is. It was a statement about what a person costs, and that number fell by three orders of magnitude in two years.